Saturday, February 21, 2009

Jessica Stockholder



"In Making a Clean Edge...I thought of it as a still life. Because of the space, you couldn't get far from the work, so in a sense it was unavailable to see fully. Making a Clean Edge was in some ways about the difficulty of full understanding, about exploring the thought processes, where ideas come from, and how complicated the mind is. When you understand something and have it thoroughly explained, in some sense you've limited it; the explanation defeats the fullness of the experience."

Jessica Stockholder
Inside the Studio: Two Decades of Talks with Artists in New York
Independent Curators International, 2004

Friday, February 20, 2009

02.20.09


Tom Moody



"One of the favored analogies of the people on the Rhizome chatboards attacking current art on blogs and WIKIS is 'using animated GIFs and default blog templates is like using acrylic paint and prestretched canvases!'"

Post on Tom Moody's blog

I use acrylic paint and make animated gifs. I stretch my own canvases though. This sort of techno-centrism that Moody is pointing out doesn't interest me at all. Yes, I use computers extensively, but they are a tool that I use to get the job done. I could quit using them tomorrow if the work dictated it. This sort of thinking seems to smack of the old "photography killed painting" debate that I don't anyone takes seriously anymore. It's about the work not the medium.

Thursday, February 19, 2009

02.19.09







Tuesday, February 17, 2009

Amy Sillman



Amy Sillman: "I think I always was interested in the thing that you weren't supposed to be interested in. But isn't everyone?"

Ian Berry: "I don't think so. I think a lot of people are driven by trying to reach some sort kind of suburban ideal, or the desire to be like their own image of success. Some people want precisely not to be against. They would rather their lawn looked just like their neighbor's, or that they had the same shoes as their friend."

AS: "I suppose I am fueled by that too- everyone wants not to look ugly. We want to wear shoes that someone else says are cool or have a good haircut that looks sexy or whatever. But then at the same time, everyone is trying to be subversive. The only thing that makes an artist different is that an artist has an object that stands in for her and speaks to that subversion articulately."

Amy Sillman
Amy Sillman: Third Person Singular
The Francis Young Teaching Museum and Art Gallery, 2008

02.17.09 Digital Sketch / 5 Variations

Monday, February 16, 2009

02.16.09 Digital Sketch / 6 Variations

Saturday, February 14, 2009

Olafur Eliasson on Fred Sandback

"For me, the artist Fred Sandback is the best since his work renegotiates itself every time it is exposed to any space or individual that encounters it. What inspires me most about Sandback is his idea that space is based on a relationship in progress, and within this relationship or trajectory I can both reflect on the space and use the space to reflect on myself. Contrary to a generalized or "normative" space that promotes a single view or method as being predominantly correct, this personal act of self-reflection- throught the engagement with "non-normative" space- both inspires and supports great ideas of individuality in the diverse range of experiences generated between viewers and the work. In other words, Sandback's work has enabled me to be the co-producer of my own space, and to become the projecting vanishing-point from where I can negotiate and constitute a space of time."

Olafur Eliasson
Artists' Favorites: Act II (London: Institute of Contemporary Arts; Frankfurt am Main: Revolver), 2004, p. 9

Thursday, February 12, 2009

02.12.09







Wednesday, February 11, 2009

02.11.09_v2







Tuesday, February 10, 2009

02.11.09







02.10.09







02.10.09 Digital Sketch / 18 Variations

02.09.09 Digital Sketch

Saturday, February 7, 2009

Fred Sandback



Fred Sandback is an artist that I just recently became aware of that is considered by some to be a link between minimalism and post-minimalism. The works for which he is most known are geometric volumes defined by acrylic yarn, almost like three dimensional drawings in real space. I first saw his work this past December while visiting my wife's family for the holidays. I went to Indianapolis Museum of Art (a great museum for a city that size) which had a room with three of his sculptures. On a trip to NYC last week I saw two more of his works, one in a group show at the James Cohan Gallery, and the other at MoMA.

The first encounter, at IMA, may be the one that sticks out in my mind the most for what was perhaps an unintended effect. One of the works consisted of several stands of colored yarn stretched from floor to ceiling. The virtual planes created by these lines seemed to shift and undulate due to the air currents from the heating system. I was suprized how such a seemingly simple work had such a profound perceptual and emotional effect. I have at least passing familiarity with a good deal of the work up at IMA at any given time, but these pieces were new and exciting to me. (There were also some Adrian Schiess paintings I was happy to see although the installation wasn't that great, I've seen his work look much better others places such as Albright-Knox in a show last year)

The second time I saw Sandback's work was at the James Cohan group show. The work, another piece that had yarn spanning from floor to ceiling, in that show looked really terrific. It definitely was one of the stronger works on display.

The third encounter with his work at MoMA was troubling for me. It was one of his trapezoids leaning against the wall. On a adjacent wall was a Dan Flavin florescent light sculpture. I usually like Flavin but this piece was mean and pushy, it filled the room with this saccharine white light that made the Sandback look too tense and brittle. I wanted to smash those stupid light tubes. I kept unconsciously trying to stand in between the two sculptures to block the light but of course that didn't help at all. I was surprised that the curators at MoMA would have made such a poor choice for the placement of these works.

I've been interested in Minimalist and post-Minimalist work for almost 20 years. I must have seen Sandback's work before, yet I can't recall ever seeing it anywhere. Strangely, out of the blue a few years after the artist's death, I have seen five substantial works of his in three different venues. Perhaps his work is making a comeback. It certainly deserves it. I hope I have the chance to see more soon. Maybe the Memorial Art Gallery in Rochester will organize a retrospective. I can dream, can't I?

edit- I just realized that I missed a show at David Zwirner that's closing on the 14th of Sandback's work. It's times like this that I agonize about not living in NYC anymore, I miss the food too. grrrr!

Thomas Nozkowski




"That’s why ultimately I’ll tell them. I’ll explain one painting. This is about blah-blah-blah-blah. But it’s misleading—because what does it accomplish? Now you have a nice story, but does that make the picture any more interesting? And on another deeper level… by the time the painting’s spent all that time ripening on the easel, all kinds of other stuff has come into it. The experience becomes richer and richer and richer, and how the hell can you explain that? If someone can just sense the richness—boy, that’s enough. That’s plenty."

Thomas Nozkowski
Bomb Magazine Issue 65 Fall 1998
http://www.bombsite.com/issues/65/articles/2171

Arturo Herrera



"I use a lot of elementary forms, monochromatic colors, black and white, paper fragments. But as you say, the graphic has specific messages—it’s political, or it’s advertising. It is successful if it gets its point across. My work actually tries to discourage a specific message. It tries to free a place up, to clarify through ambiguity. I use strategies of design and placement to enable the viewer to access the image. In other words, it’s a bridge, but it is paved with the viewer’s own references and associations."

"There are things that Balanchine in particular deals with involving neoclassicism. He had a very clear understanding of what the body can do, and he allowed the music and the movement to become one. Balanchine uncovered the architecture of the music by using the simplest of geometric forms in his choreography. It is an analytical choreography."

Arturo Herrera
Bomb Magazine Issue 93 Fall 2005
http://www.bombsite.com/issues/93/articles/2755


02.07.09 Colored Pencil and Ink

Friday, February 6, 2009

02.06.09 Colored Pencil and Ink

02.06.09 Colored Pencil and Ink